Legal Opinion
Hartz Mountain v. NJ Sports & Exposition Auth.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 14, 2004PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
848 A.2d 793 (2004)
369 N.J. Super. 175
HARTZ MOUNTAIN INDUSTRIES, INC., on its own behalf and on behalf of the joint venture known as "Expo Park," Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NEW JERSEY SPORTS & EXPOSITION AUTHORITY, The Mills Corporation, and Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, Defendants-Respondents.
Elliot Braha, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated members, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority, The Mills Corporation, and Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, Defendants-Respondents.
In the Matter of the NJSEA's Denial of the December 2, 2003, January 2, 2004, and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- George Harms Construction Co. v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Payton v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Loigman v. KimmelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- South Jersey Publishing Co. v. New Jersey Expressway AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Keyes Martin & Co. v. Director, Div. of PurchaseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- MAG v. Division of ABCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Gannett NJ Partners v. MiddlesexNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Vas v. RobertsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Bergen v. North Jersey MediaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Burnett v. BoardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.