Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Mauldin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 28, 1969No. J-391PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting Chief Judge.

The defendant in an action for overtime compensation has appealed from an adverse final judgment entered by the Circuit Court for Bay County, based upon a jury verdict.

The sole point presented for our determination in this appeal is whether, where the plaintiff by his complaint and under the evidence asserts two claims for relief and seeks recovery of damages for overtime compensation under two theories of recovery, one for breach of contract and the other under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, the trial court' committed reversible, error in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. NoblesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. George W. Bell, Jr., James E. Brewton, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Aerodex, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API