Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Lainson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided August 2, 1948No. 47226PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMuleoney, J.

Plaintiff, an inmate of the state penitentiary at Fort Madison, filed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus alleging he is being illegally restrained of his liberty by the defendant; Lainson, warden of that institution. The writ was denied and plaintiff appeals and here argues that the judgment under which he was committed to the penitentiary for life was void because (1) the sentencing court did not have jurisdiction to commit plaintiff to the penitentiary at Fort Madison, and (2) all proceedings in connection therewith failed to grant unto him his constitutional rights, both of the State…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Jackson v. BoydSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  3. Madsen v. ObermannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  4. Adams v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  5. State v. SmitchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sewell v. LainsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  2. Birk v. BennettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  3. Hart v. BestSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  4. Herold v. HaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  5. Evans v. RosenbergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API