Legal Opinion

Culp v. Hecht

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHERICK, PJ.

The demurrer filed in this case alleged that the trial court had no jurisdiction of the subject of the action, and that the petition of the plaintiff did not state facts which show a cause of action. It is the thought of the plaintiff in error that he is unable to procure adequate relief in a court of law and that such relief is only procurable in a court of equity, in an action in the nature of a creditor’s bill, as herein filed. We are unable to have this understanding of the situation. It was not the intention of the Legislature by the enactment of §11760, GC, to take away any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. STATE Ex SPIRES v. ALLREAD EtOhio Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adams Robinson Enterprises v. Envirologix Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Cann v. George B. Williams Land & Livestock Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Olive Branch Holdings, L.L.C. v. Smith Technology Development, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API