Legal Opinion

Peters v. LeDoux

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1971No. 9278PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OMAN, Justice.

The New Mexico Court of Appeals affirmed a judgment of the trial court in favor of plaintiffs against both defendants. LeDoux v. Peters, 82 N.M. 661, 486 P.2d 70 (1971). The case is now before us on certiorari. We affirm the results reached by both the trial court and the Court of Appeals, but disagree with some of the appraisals and conclusions of the Court of Appeals as to the New Mexico law on the family purpose doctrine.

We consider only the second issue raised by defendant, Helen Peters, hereinafter referred to as defendant, under her first point relied upon for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Lopez Ex Rel. Lopez v. BarrerasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Robinson v. EbertWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Coffman v. McFaddenWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Burkhart v. CornNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DuranNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Craig A. Dell v. William A. Heard, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  3. May v. BakliniNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Madrid v. ShryockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Regenold v. RutherfordNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API