Legal Opinion

Moore v. City of Platteville

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Grant County. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

This action was commenced by the plaintiff to recover for injuries which she alleges she received by falling through a plank sidewalk on one of the public streets in said city. She also alleges that her fall and injury were the result of a defect in said sidewalk at the place where she was injured, occasioned by the use of a' defective and insufficient piece of plank used by the said city in repairing such sidewalk. The walk upon Avhick she was traveling at the time she was injured, was constructed of plank placed lengthwise the street, upon stringers or supports four feet apart. The planks…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hasbrouck v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
  2. State v. GlassWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Grant v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Millard v. LyonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Seymour v. ColburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CocklinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Burton v. NeillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Hodges v. O'BrienWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  4. State v. PriceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Orr v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API