Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Argyro

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 22, 1924No. 6 Div. 97PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

.SATRE, J.

Appellant, as plaintiff in the trial court, recovered judgment against appellee for that appellee, a purveyor of food, a restaurateur, served him a centipede with his food, but, being dissatisfied with the damages assessed, prosecutes this appeal. Only such alleged errors are to be considered as may have affected the quantum of damages. Rulings on demurrer to the complaint are assigned for error; but, for a reason to be hereafter stated, error in such r.ulings, if any, need not be considered.

Plaintiff’s case was about like this: Plaintiff and a companion went into defendant’s place…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Greenwood Cafe v. LovinggoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Austin v. Tennessee Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. Arnold J. Uhl v. Echols Transfer Company and Rufus Johnson, I. H. Eskridge v. Echols Transfer Company and Rufus JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  3. Davis v. ErwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Holley v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  5. Quinn v. Swift & Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API