Legal Opinion

Northeastern Oklahoma Community Development Corp. v. Adams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 29, 1973No. 46504PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Justice.

This is an application for writ of mandamus against the district judge of Mayes County, John Q. Adams, requesting that he be ordered to change venue of the action and to disqualify the respondent attorney for conflict of interest. Mandamus against respondent attorney ordering his disqualification is also requested.

The question presented as one of first impression in Oklahoma. The issue to be resolved is whether, in the absence of any court appearance, the filing of a written appearance to extend time to answer, creates and establishes in and of itself, the confidential and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re MatteraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. State v. LeighSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  3. United States v. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  4. WE Bassett Company v. HC Cook CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1962
  5. In Re BondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McClanahan v. HamiltonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MiskovskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. PevetoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. NORTHEASTERN OK. COMMUNITY DEV. CORP. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  5. Salda v. Brighthouse Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API