Legal Opinion
Naumburg v. Pattison
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1985No. 15351Published
1Opinion of the Court
711 P.2d 1387 (1985)
103 N.M. 649
Peter H. NAUMBURG and Haila H. Naumburg, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Buell N. PATTISON and Jean D. Pattison, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 15351.
Supreme Court of New Mexico.
December 30, 1985.
Simons, Cuddy & Friedman, Daniel H. Friedman, Santa Fe, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Garrett, Richards & Associates, David F. Richards, Clovis, for defendants-appellees.
OPINION
SOSA, Senior Justice.
Due to defendants' refusal to accept prepayment on a real estate contract, plaintiffs, relying on the Residential Home Loan Act (RHLA), sought a…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zion's Properties, Inc. v. HoltUtah Supreme Court · 1975
- Perez v. Health and Social ServicesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- Letha Cantrell Guthrie v. Finis CurnuttCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Davis v. Commissioner of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- Dunn v. LigonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.