City of Chicago v. Hagley
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson
delivered the-opinion of the court:
This appeal is from a judgment of the municipal court of Chicago finding appellant guilty of operating an ice cream parlor without having obtained a license, as required by section 3431 of the municipal code, which reads: “No person, firm or corporation shall carry on, engage in or conduct the business of keeping what is commonly or generally known as an ice cream parlor, which is hereby defined as a place where ice cream, ices and ice cream beverages are kept and offered for sale to be consumed on the premises, without first having obtained a license in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Village of Lagrange Park v. JareckiIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Chicago v. PetersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
- Village of Riverside v. KuhneIllinois Supreme Court · 1947