People v. Brown
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*923OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The defendant contends that the Trial Judge did not apply the proper criteria with respect to the prosecutor’s right to cross-examine the defendant concerning his prior criminal record (People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371). Specifically, he claims that the court’s use of the phrase "readiness to do it again” indicates that the court was applying a propensity standard as a factor in its considerations. However, reading the court’s remarks as a whole reveals that the proper balancing test was employed, and that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. ShieldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by33 opinions
- People v. WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. DawsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. DodtNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. BennetteNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.