Reeves v. Pecos County Water Improvement Dist. No. 1
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtShort, P. J.
It is vigorously insisted in the motion for rehearing that the effect of our decision is to deprive defendants in error of the value of the water rights owned by them, that plaintiffs in error have no interest in where the water covered by their water rights is used, and would suffer no damage by reason of their use of the water on other and different lands from those to which such water rights were restricted.
We think this insistence is due to a misconception by defendants in error as to the extent of the water rights held by them. They are insisting upon an enlargement of such rights…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Curlee v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Hooper v. LottmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
3Cited by5 opinions
- Paul v. Houston Oil Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Alt v. BurtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
- Harris County Houston Ship Channel Nav. Dist. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Reeves v. Pecos County Water Improvement Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Reeves v. Pecos County Water Improvement Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930