State v. Newell
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury for procuring an abortion on a woman, was tried in the district court for Hennepin county, before Dicldnson, J., and a jury which returned a verdict of guilty. From orders denying her motions for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Dibell, C.
The defendant was found guilty of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree in the commission of an abortion upon one Pansy Miller. The crime is defined by G. S. 1913, § 8610 (R. L. 1905, § 4882). The defendant appeals from an order denying her motion for a new trial upon the ground of insufficiency of evidence and errors of law, and from an order denying a like motion upon the ground of newly discovered evidence.
1. In passing upon the defendant’s claim that the evidence does not sustain the verdict we do not undertake to detail the testimony. Mrs. Miller was a young married…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. SeamanMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Clark v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. HagenowIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- State v. FitchetteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- State v. BrownNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. HobbsIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. SteadmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- State v. RowleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
- State v. CragunUtah Supreme Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.