Legal Opinion

Marsham v. Government of the Virgin Islands

District Court, Virgin Islands

Decided June 13, 2001No. CRIM.APP.1999-173PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Appellant Warrington Marsham [“Mars-ham” or “appellant”] appeals his twenty-seven-year sentence and order of restitution upon his conviction by plea of guilty to three counts of grand larceny. Finding that the sentencing judge did not abuse his discretion and did not violate Marsham’s Fifth or Eighth Amendment rights, we will affirm Marsham’s prison sentence. We will vacate the order of restitution, however, since restitution may not be ordered in the Virgin Islands without first placing a defendant on probation.

I. FACTUAL AND LEGAL BACKGROUND

Between July 12 and September…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Nibbs v. RobertsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Warrington MarshamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. Davis v. Government of the Virgin IslandsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API