Legal Opinion
Gibbs v. Kashak
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 31, 2008No. 64A03-0706-CV-288PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAY, Judge.
Sally Gibbs and Jack David Kashak are siblings and the beneficiaries of their parents’ trusts. Jack served as trustee until he was removed by court order on August 5, 2005. Sally filed suit seeking partition of land held by the trust and damages from Jack for breach of fiduciary duty. Sally wanted the land sold and the proceeds divided. Instead, the trial court ordered the land divided. It also denied Sally’s claim for damages. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Norbert and Eileen Kashak owned approximately forty acres of land. There are two houses on the property. Some…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Grub v. Estate of WadeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Culley v. McFadden Lake Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Estate of Skalka v. SkalkaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Pavy v. PavyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
- Bronnenberg v. Estate of BronnenbergIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hardy v. HardyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Gangloff Industries, Inc. v. Generic Financing & Leasing, Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Mayfair Investment Corp. v. BryantIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- NAPA/General Automotive Parts v. WhitcombIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re: The Paternity of K.D. M.G. v. S.D.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.