Legal Opinion
Hyatt v. Matal
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 1, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2009-1872Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) GILBERT P. HYATT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 05-2310 (RCL) ) Civil Action No. 09-1864 (RCL) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-1872 (RCL) ) ANDREI JANCU, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION! I. Background Before the Court is a trio of actions brought under 35 U.S.C. §145, related to three of Gilbert Hyatt’s applications to patent features of his “600- family” and “700-family” specifications that purport to describe innovations Mr. Hyatt made in the field of video processing and associated computing and memory architectures in the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Vas-Cath Incorporated and Gambro, Inc. v. Sakharam D. Mahurkar, and Quinton Instruments CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.