Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Paulk
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
The exceptions pendente lite, not being argued or in any way insisted upon, will be treated as abandoned.
“In the absence of positive evidence of negligence, or, where the only express evidence of negligence on behalf of the plaintiff is a mere expression of opinion, the presumption of negligence arising against a railroad company from proof of the killing of an animal is met and overcome by evidence for the defendant company showing that the animal could not have been seen soon enough to avoid the casualty, and that after it was discovered all diligence was used to prevent the killing. But…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Atlanta & Charlotte Air-Line Rwy. Co. v. GravittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Crown Cotton Mills v. McNallySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Atlantic & Birmingham Railway Co. v. CluteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gem City Life Insurance v. StriplingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Dodd v. CallawayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. TwedellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.