Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Burroughs

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1930No. Docket No. 93, Calendar No. 34,910PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

The trial court on motion declined to dismiss the bill of' complaint and defendants have appealed. The allegations of the bill, here taken as true, are- that plaintiffs constructed on lot 234 of Carton Park in Flint a dwelling house, that the lot is owned by defendants Burroughs, subject to outstanding land contract in defendants Tanhersley, that plaintiffs so constructed by mistake, that defendants Tanhersley have taken possession of the house and occupy it, that defendants decline to make any adjustment with plaintiffs, and that the value of the house is $1,250'.

No fraud is alleged, nor is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hatcher v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Union Hall Ass'n v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  3. Isle Royale Mining Co. v. HertinMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Rzeppa v. SeymourMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Olin v. ReineckeIllinois Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. McCreary v. ShieldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Somerville v. JacobsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Ollig v. EaglesMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Governale v. City of OwossoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Toalson v. MadisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API