Smith v. State
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district conrt for Douglas county. Tried • below before Neville J. cited: 1 Whart. Crim. Law, 711. Commonwealth v. Searle, 2 Binney, 332. People v. Pathbun, 21 Wend., 509. United States v. Carter, 2 Cranch C. C., 243. United States v. Mitchell, 1 Bald. ,366.
1Opinion of the CourtEeese, J.
An information was presented to the district court by the district attorney, containing two counts, one for the crime of forging a check for $250 on the United States National Bank of Omaha, the other for uttering and publishing as genuine the same check. Upon trial he was found guilty as charged in the second count of the information, and sentenced accordingly. He now prosecutes error to this court.
The principal, and in fact the only contention of plaintiff in error is, that the verdict of the jury is not sustained by sufficient evidence. The facts as testified to by the prosecuting witness…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Folden v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brazil v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- State v. WeisArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Maloney v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Robeen v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.