Legal Opinion

Stella v. Graham-Paige Motors Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 29, 1956No. 258, Docket 23899PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the district judge, reported in Stella v. Graham-Paige Motors Corporation, D.C., 132 F.Supp. 100.

1. The trial judge, we think correctly, adopted the reasoning of Judge Samuel Kaufman’s decision, denying a summary judgment, reported in D.C., 104 F.Supp. 957, in holding that Graham-Paige, for purposes of Section 16(b), 15 U.S.C.A. § 78p, became the “beneficial owner” of 10% of the Kaiser-Frazer *301stock at the very moment when Graham-Paige purchased that stock. Before Judge Kaufman, the S. E. C. filed a brief as amicus curiae in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Jane Perlman v. C. Russell Feldmann, Newport Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  5. United States v. Toronto, Hamilton & Buffalo Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Foremost-McKeeson, Inc. v. Provident Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Norte & Co. v. R. L. Huffines, Jr. And Victor Muscat, and L. F. Serrick, Alfred O'gara, Edward Krock and Defiance Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  3. Margot Newmark v. Rko General, Inc., and Frontier Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  4. Adler v. KlawansCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  5. Blau v. OppenheimDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API