Legal Opinion
In re Hall
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 11, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtMcNaught, J.
The petitioner bases his application in this proceeding upon the provisions of section 330 of the Election Law. The relief sought is in effect a peremptory order of mandamus. Petitioner alleges that all of the votes cast upon the local option questions submitted in the town of Delhi at the general election November 5, 1935, and the ballots presented to voters at such election upon such questions, were void. He seeks to procure an order declaring the vote void and canceling the certificates of the *770result filed by the town board with the town clerk, and with the Liquor Authority of the State of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Whitman. No. 1New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Matter of Tamney v. . AtkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- People Ex Rel. Brown v. . FreischNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Frank v. EatonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- In re MedburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wall v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937