Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Claim of Ross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 3, 1986Published

1Dissent

Mikoll and Harvey, JJ.,

dissent and vote to reverse in a memorandum by Mikoll, J. Mikoll, J. (dissenting). We respectfully dissent. This is another in a long line of delivery services cases. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that an employer-employee relationship existed between claimants and Majestic Messenger Service, Inc. (Majestic). The facts found to be supportive of the decision are as follows. Majestic advertised for drivers and had an independent contractor agreement executed with the drivers. Majestic gave delivery assignments to claimants and other drivers and split the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re New York & New Jersey Freightways, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. In re the Claim of FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API