Legal Opinion
Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. McShane
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 12, 1945PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Per Curiam.
The appellant here succeeded to all the rights which the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation obtained by entry of the final order. (Real Property Law, § 223; U. M. Realty & Imp. Co. v. Roth, 193 N. Y. 570, 576; 507 Madison Avenue Realty Co., Inc., v. Martin, 200 App. Div. 146.) No error in the proceedings prior to the entry of the final order was claimed by the tenant. The cause of action continued. (Real Property Law, § 223; Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 82, 192. See cases in Note, 149 A. L. R. 829.) The determination that the final order was in favor of the landlord could not be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United Merchants' Realty & Improvement Co. v. RothNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- 507 Madison Avenue Realty Co. v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Petsche v. MacDonaldAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kristel v. SteinbergCity of New York Municipal Court · 1947
- 815 Park Owners, Inc. v. West LB AdminisTration, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1983
- Horan v. RothenbergNassau County District Court · 1967
- Kohl v. FuscoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1994
- Brause v. Polonez Press Box, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1997