Dudley v. McCluer
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Greene Circuit Court.-—-ITon. "W. E. Geiger, Judge. as to the admissibility of the evidence to establish the general good character of respondent for truth and veracity, cited among others, Goldsmith v. Bicard, 27 Ala. 142; Lander v. Reaver, 32 Vt. 114. on the same point cited among others, BLuan v. Berry, 8 Caines 120; Townsend v. Graves, 3, Paige 455.
1Opinion of the CourtHenry, J.
This was a suit in the Greene Circuit Court commenced in October, 1873: Plaintiff in his petition states that in December, 1859, defendant McCluer, and George R. and Clark Barrett, executed their note to Hash & Dudley, a firm composed of John Hash and Pullam Dudley, for $1,050, payable April 1, 1860, with ten per cent-interest per annum from its maturity; that on a settlement of the partnership, the note in question, became the property of said Pullam Dudley; that on the 28th day of January, 1866, said McCluer falsely and fradulently represented to said Dudley that he had paid a number of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gough v. St. JohnNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Humphrey v. HumphreySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
- Ruan v. PerryNew York Supreme Court · 1805
- Givens v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1813
3Cited by24 opinions
- Black v. EpsteinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Vawter v. HultzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Great Western Life Ins. Co. v. SparksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Stark v. Publishers George Knapp & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Simpson v. WestenbergerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.