Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Brenner

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 6, 1940No. 34,817Published

1DissentDawson, C. J.

It is an elementary rule of law that penal statutes must be construed strictly. (State v. Chapman, 33 Kan. 134, 5 Pac. 768.) Nothing may be added to them by inference or intendment. (Bagley Investment Co. v. Merrick, 122 Kan. 734, 735, 253 Pac. 562, and citations.) To say that a theft of merchandise from a baggage truck standing on the platform of a railway station is a larceny in a railway depot or station home seems erroneous in two aspects,, first, a baggage truck is neither a depot nor a station house; and second, the decision of the majority completely ignores the settled rule of this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. Elmer F. Bagley Investment Co. v. MerrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API