Legal Opinion
Schaefer v. Spence
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 8, 1991No. 17099PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHRUM, Judge.
Barbeque sauce developer sued his former business partners alleging breach of contract, conversion, and fraud after the former partners obtained the developer’s spice formula and attempted without success to duplicate the sauce. Following a bench trial, the court issued extensive “findings of fact” and denied recovery to the sauce developer. He appeals; we affirm.
FACTS
In his brief, the appellant George Schae-fer adopts the trial court’s findings of fact as his statement of facts. From those findings, Schaefer’s trial exhibits filed with this court, and the pleadings, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Breece v. JettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Schnucks Twenty-Five, Inc. v. BettendorfMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Lacks v. R. Rowland & Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Biermann v. Gus Shaffar Ford, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Superior Edge, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Superior Edge, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Colton, McMichael, Lester, Auman, Visnovske, Inc. v. MuellerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Monarch Fire Protection v. Freedom ConsultingDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2009
- Riley v. L.J. Schuster Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.