Legal Opinion

Whalen v. Vallier

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1928No. 4845PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

Respondent brought this action against appellants to enforce payment of a promissory note for $1,500 and to foreclose a real estate mortgage given to secure the same. The appeal is from a judgment in favor of respondent for the full amount of the note, together with interest and attorney fees, and decree of foreclosure of the mortgage, and also from an order overruling appellants’ motion for a new trial.

A brief outline of the facts may be thus given: In the year 1914 one Woodman and wife owned the real estate covered by the mortgage herein, and had mortgaged the same to respondent to secure a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Campbell v. GowansUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Bartel v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Griswold v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Ritter v. PlumbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Tappan v. MorsemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ulen v. KnecttleWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Hunsaker v. RhodehouseIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Brainard v. BrainardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Nielson v. WestromIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Eaton v. McWilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API