Legal Opinion
Carrao v. Committee of the Unauthorized Practice of Law
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided July 26, 1982No. 05-82-00271-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GUITTARD, Chief Justice.
We affirm this judgment on the ground that we have no authority to consider a late-filed statement of facts, notwithstanding the amendment to rule 386 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure which took effect on January 1, 1981.
In this case the sixty-day period provided by rule 386 for filing a record expired on March 28,1982. No statement of facts was filed by that date, although the transcript had been filed earlier. No motion to extend the time for filing the statement of facts was filed within the fifteen days prescribed by rule 21c of the Texas Rules of Civil…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Englander Co. v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- BD CLICK CO. INC. v. Safari Drilling Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
- DeLeon v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Cheney v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- First National Bank of Glen Rose v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
3Cited by6 opinions
- Humble Exploration Co. v. Browning, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
- Howell v. Dallas County Child Welfare Unit, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
- Radio Station WQCK v. T.M. Communications, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
- Garrity v. Holiday Inns, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1984
- Humble Exploration Co. v. Browning, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.