Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hines v. Hines

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 22, 1965No. G-312Published

1DissentSturgis, Judge

The motion forming the subject of the majority opinion is verified by an affidavit of the movant reflecting compliance with a final decree which dissolved the marriage and awarded permanent alimony and child support money to appellant payable in monthly installments. In a dissent in Fort v. Fort, 167 So.2d 315 (Fla.App.1964), I discussed at length my views concerning the inapplicability of Florida Appellate Rule 3.8(b) to an appeal from a postdecretal order reducing an award of permanent alimony payable in periodic installments. The principles which I sought to express in that dissent apply…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walnut Irrigation Dist. v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Fort v. FortDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. Brackin v. BrackinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API