Legal Opinion

Bank One, Dayton v. Nave (In Re Nave)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided November 10, 1986No. Bankruptcy No. 3-86-00187, Adv. No. Contested Matter (A)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION DETERMINING SECURED CLAIM OF BANK ONE

THOMAS F. WALDRON, Bankruptcy Judge.

This is a case arising under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(a) and having been referred to this court is determined to be a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E), in which the movant/creditor, Bank One, Dayton, NA, hereinafter Bank One, claims a perfected security interest in the proceeds from the sale of certain corn grown by the respondents/debtors-in-possession, hereinafter, Naves.

I.Procedural Posture

This matter was before the court in connection with a motion by Bank One requesting an order to prohibit the use of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schneider v. Ray (In Re Roberts)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1984
  2. Miami Valley Production Credit Ass'n v. Klipfer (In Re Klipfer)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
  3. Pillsbury Co. v. Herbolsheimer (In Re Herbolsheimer)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. In Re WatersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1988
  3. United States v. Dale Smith, Suzanne Smith, Gordon E. Mills and Sharon R. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  4. In Re AdamUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988
  5. Bank of Cresbard v. Lindhorst Farms, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API