Legal Opinion

Kington v. Ewart

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 10, 1917No. 20,448PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Finney district court; George J. Downer, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

This action was commenced in August, 1906. Originally it involved the right to possession of the west half of the northwest quarter of section 32, township 25, range 32, in Finney county, which the plaintiff, Kington, claimed to own. The defendant, John McClurg Ewart, claimed title under a tax deed, from which plaintiff asserted the right to re~ *50deem. Prior to the commencement of the action Ewart had contracted to sell to O. B. Looney, at $4 an acre, the quarter section which included the eighty acres in controversy. Under their contract,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Every v. RainsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. City of Arkansas City v. PayneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. First National Bank v. DuncanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. Watt v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. Meek v. DealSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rapid Transit Lines, Inc. v. Wichita Developers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  2. S. H. Reno v. Ralph G. Beckett and Elizabeth G. Beckett, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
  3. Bray v. BaylesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980
  4. Wilson v. StephensonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Mickadeit v. Kansas Power and Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API