Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Royal Insurance

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided November 18, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 14233-4PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECKER, District Judge.

This is a diversity suit on a scheduled personal property floater policy insuring against theft of personal property among other risks. Defendant has moved for a summary judgment on all issues. A summary judgment on all issues may not be entered unless it conclusively appears that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and that the movant is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P.

A scheduled personal property floater policy may be said to be transitory in the sense that the insured property is movable and is insured when carried…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Home Insurance v. DickSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Clay v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Lilienthal v. KaufmanOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Dickirson v. the Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1973
  2. Moss v. National Life and Accident Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1974
  3. Folger Coffee Co. v. Great American Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1971
  4. Jordan v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API