Legal Opinion

Hayward v. Sencenbaugh

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Second District ; — heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Kane county; the Hon. L. C. Ruth, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice; Hand

delivered the opinion of the court:

' This was an action of assumpsit commenced in the circuit court of Kane county by Laban Hayward, as administrator of the estate of William B. Russell, deceased, against S. S. Sencenbaugh, to enforce against Sencenbaugh his stock liability as a stockholder in the Aurora Mining Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Kansas, in payment of certain of the bonds of said corporation held by Hayward as the administrator of Russell. A jury was waived, and upon a trial the court rendered judgment in favor of Hayward, as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Buck v. County of HamiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Wells & French Co. v. KapaczynskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Patterson v. WarfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Mercer v. Wyanet Electric Light Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Olson v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Wilms v. KleinOhio Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API