Legal Opinion

State v. Dailey

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 2009No. M2007-01874-SC-R11-CDPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · ClarkCornelia A. Clark, J.

in which JANICE M. HOLDER, C.J., GARY R. WADE, and WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JJ., and E. RILEY ANDERSON, Sp. J., joined.

We granted permission to appeal the Defendant’s certified question of law to determine whether the police violated the Defendant’s constitutional rights by subjecting him to a custodial interrogation without first informing him of his constitutional rights as required by the Supreme Court’s decision in Miranda v. Arizona. We hold that the Defendant’s confessions, both obtained in violation of his federal and state constitutional privileges against self-incrimination,…

3Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by39 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. David Hooper Climer, Jr.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
  3. Pueblo v. Millán PachecoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2011
  4. State v. MunteanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  5. State of Tennessee v. Lindsey Brooke LoweTennessee Supreme Court · 2018

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API