Legal Opinion

Drennen & Co. v. Jasper Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 19, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Walker Law and Equity Court. . Heard before Hon. T. L. Sowell. Action by the Jasper Investment Company against one Drennen and others. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, certain defendants appeal.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Walker Law and Equity Court. . Heard before Hon. T. L. Sowell. Action by the Jasper Investment Company against one Drennen and others. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, certain defendants appeal. The court erred in overruling the motion to set aside and annul the summons in this case.— Sec. 3271, Code 1896; Mayo, et al. v. Stoneman, 2 Ala. 390; Johnson v. King, 20 Ala. 270; Boardman v. Parrish, 56 Ala. 54. The plea need not have been verified. —Day v. Hackober, 60 Ala. 425; Mohr v. Chaffee, 75 Ala. 388. The defect should have been pointed out by demurrer. — Black v. The…

1Opinion of the CourtHaralson, J.

— The suit was by the Jasper Investment Company, appellee, in the law and equity court of Walker county, against Drennen & Co., the appellants, and W. D. Leatherwood, for the conversion of two mules. Leatherwood lived in Walker, and Drennen & Co. lived in Jefferson county.

*324• Drennen & Co. had obtainned a judgment, in the cir: cuit court of Walker 'county, against the Jasper C'oal Company, for the- sum of $1,500, besides costs, and execution had issued thereon' against said company. It Avas ■levied- on Iavo mules and a lot of land, as the property- of- said company, ' The lands Avere sold under…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mayo v. StoneumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Montgomery B. & T. Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Johnson v. Blocton-Cahaba Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. King v. GibbsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API