Legal Opinion

Pattengell v. Welsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 4, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action to determine whether the infant defendant is insured by the defendant insurance company, said insurance company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated August 6, 1980, which denied its motion for summary judgment. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and appellant’s motion for summary judgment is granted. The only way the infant defendant could be covered under the policy issued by defendant insurance company to defendant Howard Cox is if said infant was “in the care of” defendant Cox or if defendant Cox was married to the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. SweetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Bashor v. Excess InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Lang v. Hanover InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Preferred Mutual Insurance v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Starr Indemnity & Liability Company v. Choice Hotels International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API