Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Stover

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 7, 1995No. 1940596PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This petition for the writ of mandamus requires an interpretation of the provisions of Rule 9(h), Ala.R.Civ.P., relating to fictitious parties, and the provisions of Rule 15(c), Ala.R.Civ.P., pertaining to the relation-back of amendments to pleadings. The specific question presented is whether a plaintiff who was allegedly injured while operating an off-line decorator machine at Scott Paper Company, and who described a defendant or defendants in the caption to his complaint as "J, K, and/or L, being the person, firm or corporation who manufactured, designed, sold, distributed, retailed or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. COLUMBIA ENGINEERING INTERN., LTD. v. EspeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Ex Parte FMC Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Fulmer v. Clark Equip. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Ex Parte KlemaweschSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Ex Parte Chemical Lime of Alabama, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  3. Ex Parte International Refining & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Ex Parte Mobile Infirmary Association, 1091490 (Ala. 6-24-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  5. Ex Parte Novus Utilities, Inc., 1101127 (Ala. 12-2-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API