Legal Opinion

Mayes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 1979No. Nos. 41100, 41101PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Senior Judge.

Movant Leroy Mayes, hereafter “defendant,” has appealed the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. *638Six years after trial defendant sought to vacate his conviction for murder which had been affirmed on appeal. See State v. McKinney and Mayes, 475 S.W.2d 51 (Mo.1971).

By his amended motion defendant pleaded his retained trial counsel, Mr. Curtis Crawford, had failed to give him effective assistance. At trial co-defendant McKinney was represented by Mr. Robert Dierker.

Defendant first complains his counsel failed to adequately interview him. As to that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Maggard v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  2. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  3. Skaggs v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  4. Shepherd v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Jackson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  2. Joiner v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Ryder v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Graham v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Fletcher v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API