People v. Baker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. The police had reasonable suspicion warranting the stop of defendant’s vehicle (see, People v Landy, 59 NY2d 369, 376; People v Sobotker, 43 NY2d 559, 563; People v Byrd, 156 AD2d 374, lv denied 75 NY2d 811). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the People were not required to present the testimony of the person who transmitted the radio communication to the arresting officer (see, People v Landy, supra; People v Beckwith, 163 AD2d 863; People v Knight, 162 AD2d 970, lv denied 76 NY2d 941). The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. SobotkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. LandyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ByrdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. MasonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. BowenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. GoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. CongelosiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. DelancyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.