Legal Opinion

Allen v. Roughan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 3, 1912No. Gen. No. 17,170PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Isidore H. Himes, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barnes

This is a case of the fourth class. Paragraph 6 of Section 23 of the Municipal Court Act provides two methods of preserving for review a record of proceedings had at the trial. One is by a correct statement of the facts appearing upon the trial and of the questions of law involved and of the decisions of the court thereon, and the other is by a correct stenographic report of the proceedings at the trial and correct statement of such other proceedings as the party requesting it may desire to have reviewed. Whichever it is it must be authenticated or attested as such by the judge of that court,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Union Central Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Seehausen Wehrs & Co. v. Interstate Steel & Iron Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1909
  3. Levy v. J. Frohlich & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reinwald v. McGregorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  2. Cohn v. LewisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API