Schirmer v. Penkert
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In three related actions, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., for indemnification, and for a judgment declaring that Utica First Insurance Company, the defendant in actions Nos. 2 and 3, is obligated to defend and indemnify Robert A. Penkert in action No. 1, Robert A. Penkert appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), dated June 4, 2004, as (a) denied that branch of his motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint in action No. 2 and declaring that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Bray v. CoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Process Plants Corp. v. Beneficial National Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Curanovic v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Zilkha v. Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Interboro Insurance v. FatmirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Varshavskaya v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Precision Auto Accessories, Inc. v. Utica First InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Joseph v. Interboro Insurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Novick v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.