Legal Opinion

Yount v. Maisano

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 14, 1993No. 92-CA-1031PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISBAUM, Judge.

This is a suit for damages for personal injuries sustained in a physical altercation. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant-insurance company has appealed. We affirm and remand.

ISSUES

We are called upon to determine three specific questions:(1) Whether the plaintiffs answer to the appeal may be considered wherein issues are raised concerning non-appealing parties,(2) Whether the jury’s factual finding that the defendant-insured did not intend to cause the plaintiff’s resulting injuries is manifestly erroneous, thereby falling outside the scope of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  3. Meloy v. Conoco, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  4. Breland v. SchillingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  5. Vicknair v. Hibernia Bldg. Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Yount v. MaisanoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. ACCREDITED SUR. & CAS. v. McElveenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API