Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Clark

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1996No. 103664, Calendar No. 9Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRiley, J.

I agree with the lead opinion that a new trial is warranted. I write separately because I disagree that the error here is based solely on any failure to comply with MCR 6.414(F).1 Rather, I conclude that a new *596trial is necessary on the basis of the trial court’s mistake in giving the original instruction despite the fact that defense counsel relied on the modified version in his closing argument, which in turn compromised defense counsel’s ability to effectively represent defendant.2 As a consequence of the trial court’s mistake, the court effectively denied defense counsel the ability to…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API