Legal Opinion

White Star Machinery & Supply Co. v. Roulston

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 12, 1955No. 39,796PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.;

This is an action for replevin. Judgment was for plaintiff. Defendants have appealed.

After the formal allegations, the amended petition alleged plaintiff was the owner of the machinery described in a chattel mortgage *482given by defendants to plaintiff, a copy of which was attached, to secure the payment of a note for the purchase price of the machinery; that the defendants had defaulted in payment of two installments on the note and plaintiff was entitled to possession; had made demands for it and defendants had refused to deliver. The prayer…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackman v. LambertsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. Bankers Investment Co. v. MeekerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  3. State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  4. Barber v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. Beach v. FireovidSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cantrell v. Molz-Frick Implement Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  2. Cantrell v. Molz-Frick Implement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API