White Star Machinery & Supply Co. v. Roulston
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.;
This is an action for replevin. Judgment was for plaintiff. Defendants have appealed.
After the formal allegations, the amended petition alleged plaintiff was the owner of the machinery described in a chattel mortgage *482given by defendants to plaintiff, a copy of which was attached, to secure the payment of a note for the purchase price of the machinery; that the defendants had defaulted in payment of two installments on the note and plaintiff was entitled to possession; had made demands for it and defendants had refused to deliver. The prayer…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jackman v. LambertsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Bankers Investment Co. v. MeekerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Barber v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Beach v. FireovidSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cantrell v. Molz-Frick Implement Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Cantrell v. Molz-Frick Implement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960