Williams v. Holmes & Provost
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Al’PEAL FROM THE KENOSHA CIRCUIT COURT.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Smith J.
The judgment of the court below must be affirmed. In Kavanaugh vs. Titus, 5 Wis. Rep., 143, and in several other cases, we have held that motions made in the progress of a cause are not part of the record, and can only be made so by bill of exceptions, duly settled. There is no bill of exceptions in this case, and hence the motion and ruling of the court below are not properly before us.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cavenaugh v. TitusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by6 opinions
- Donkle v. MilemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Mooney v. DonovanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
- Wisconsin Face & Fire Brick Co. v. Southern Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Schomberg v. LongNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
- Dow v. DeissnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.