Legal Opinion

Benjamin T. Wiedenhoeft v. Sheriff

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided July 7, 2026No. 3:26-cv-00428Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION BENJAMIN T. WIEDENHOEFT, Petitioner, v. CAUSE NO. 3:26-CV-428-TLS-AZ SHERIFF, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER Benjamin T. Wiedenhoeft, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a habeas petition to assert his right to speedy trial in his State criminal cases. According to the petition, he has three criminal cases pending in DeKalb Superior Court and one criminal case pending in Steuben Superior Court. Pursuant to Section 2254 Habeas Corpus Rule 4, the court must dismiss the petition “[i]f it plainly appears from the petition…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Peter Lewis v. Jerry SternesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Carlos Gonzalez v. Cynthia J. O'connell, District Director, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API