Legal Opinion

E. A. Pierce & Co. v. Sayers

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1941No. Docket No. 27, Calendar No. 41,121PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiffs, after a jury trial, had a judgment against defendant in the sum of $552.50. Defendant appealed on several grounds, but limits his “statement of questions involved” to the following :

“Is it necessary for plaintiffs, alleging that they were bringing the action as a partnership where no affidavit is filed with the declaration showing who the partners are, to prove the copartnership and the members thereof where the answer neither admits nor denies the copartnership, but leaves plaintiffs to their proof?”

Court Rule No. 67, § 1 (1933), as amended, concludes with this statement:

“Ordinari…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Turnbull v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. People Ex Rel. McDonell v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Schultz v. NickelMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mitchell-Morris & Co. v. SamarasMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Krager v. Harold E. Hedler Storage, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API