Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership v. City of Middleton
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, OPINION and ORDER Plaintiff, v. 22-cv-51-jdp CITY OF MIDDLETON, MARK OPITZ, and ABBY ATTOUN, Defendants. This court awarded Rule 11 sanctions to the City of Middleton based on Adams’s failure to timely notify the city that it was withdrawing its challenge to the billboard-related provisions of Middleton’s sign code. Dkt. 75. Specifically, this court authorized the city to recoup its reasonable attorney fees expended on briefing Adams’s challenges to the on/off-premises…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rothwell Cotton Company, a Texas Corporation v. Rosenthal & Company, a Partnership, and Fgl Commodity Services, Inc., an Iowa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Austin, LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Woods v. ResnickDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2010