Legal Opinion

McClung v. Folkes

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 15, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Highland county in proceedings on a caveat. Judgment for caveatee. Caveator assigns error/

1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.

C. C. Folkes was the owner of several tracts of land in Highland county, Virginia, and, desiring to correct uncertainties or mistakes in the boundaries thereof, applied to the circuit court of said county for an inclusive survey thereof. Code, sections 2337-2360. A caveat to prevent him from obtaining a new grant upon a resurvey of his lands was filed by L. M. McClung. Thereupon the court proceeded in a summary way, without pleadings, with the *50aid of a jury, to ascertain the material facts not agreed by the parties as provided by section 2330 of the Code. The jury was sworn to try the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jackson's Administrator v. Wickham & NorthropSupreme Court of Virginia · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McClung v. FolksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  2. Rose v. AgeeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API