Wortham v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID GAULTNEY, Justice.
A jury convicted Ronald Eugene Wort-ham, Jr. of injury to a child, and the trial court sentenced Wortham to forty years in prison. Wortham challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction and the trial court’s denial of his request for jury instructions on lesser-included offenses. Because the evidence supports the jury verdict and the trial court did not err in denying the request on this record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Background
Wortham lived with C.G. and C.G.’s two-year-old daughter C.B. In March 2010, C.B. was admitted…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Arevalo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- SWEED v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Goad, Joshua LeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wortham, Ronald Eugene Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Ronald Eugene Wortham Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2014
- Wortham v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2012
- Wortham, Ronald Eugene Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Wortham, Ronald Eugene Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013